The origins of Hunnish Runic Writing (11) Syllabic signs

 Syllabic signs

 Consonants cannot be pronounced in themselves, so whole syllables are pronounced when they are sounded. When pronunciation is not determined by a written vowel character or common usage, they may be considered to represent whole syllabic groups.

Székely runic script offers the possibility of omitting vowel letters if the word’s sound system and a written vowel letter make pronunciation unambiguous. The rule of omission has not survived but its existence is indicated by the script practice of early relics.

Long vowels, the rarely used "u" and "ü" sounds and vowels in end-position are always marked (Németh/1934/18).

Later, possibly owing to the influence of Latin, vowel-elision rules changed. In late writings, usually only the sound "e" is elided, as consonants in the alphabet are read out with an anaptyctic "e" anyway.

This special writing practice, similarly to Old-Persian cuneiform script, allows the use of Székely consonant characters as syllable signs or syllable-group signs. Syllable and word scripts cannot be divided totally, and there are several transitional scripts. That is why I.J. Gelb, a historian of writing, regards Western Semitic scripts (Sinaitic, Old-Palestinian, Phoenician)[1], and W. Thomsen, who deciphered Turk runic inscriptions, Old-Turkish script as syllable scripts.

Fig. 20 "Latin-like" character orders contain "th/ty" signs, but Latin alphabet does not. They and their parallels always represent the center of the world, but sometimes only in the form of the four rivers or the divine spring, which represent Bél god. Székely "b" (Bél, belsõ = inner), "f" (Föld = Earth), "ly" (lyuk = hole), and "ty" (atya = father) support that view.

(Székely "b" (Bél = inner) and "ty" (atya = father); late Sarmatan tamgas; Chinese fu (father); Etruscan "th"; Cretan hieroglyph; Phoenician "th" (teth); Greek "th" (theta); "th" from Lykia; “th" from Karia

 

In his Rudimenta, published in 1598, Janos Thelegdi wrote that eighteen Székely consonants are simple, "b", "c", "d", "j", "f", "g", "h", "k", "l", "m", "n", "p", "k", "r", "s", "t", "v", "sz1", "sz2", "zs". Five consonants are complex, "ty", "ny", "ly", "gy", "cs", "as they are voiced with the vowel i". That means they have to be read out together with the unmarked “i” vowel. Thelegdi considered them such special syllable signs as characters "ti", "li", "ni" in ancient Cypriot and Hittite hieroglyphic syllable scripts, in which the sound “i” is not marked either. Although there is still a clear difference between the pronunciation of "ti" and "ty", Thelegdi's theory illustrates the origin of these Székely characters (syllabic signs).

Besides these letters, Thelegdi gives 21 regular syllable signs as well. These, however, are composed of runes, therefore they are ligatures with marked vowels, "ba", "be", "bi", "bo", "csa", "ga", "gi", "go", "ha", "he", "ho", "la", "le", "lo", "ra", "ri", "ro", "sa", "se", "so", "za". He gives nine irregular syllable signs, which are "placed at the end of words ... as they upset syllabification", "ncs", "nd", "ng", "ngy", "nk", "lt", "st", "rt", "nt". This classification proves regular syllabic writing practice and the existence of distinct signs marking endings and consonant clusters.

Other data also support Thelegdi's theory about writing practice. In the "USTeN" ligature from Énlaka, syllable sign "nt/tn" indeed occurs at end-position (and can be read both from right to left and from left to right; Fig. 14). The word "FeReNC" in the runic calendar, "nc" is also at the end of the word.

Steppe applications of Thelegdi's special "ncs", "nd", "ng", "ni", "nt", 'lt" syllable signs are shown in the Turkish "ncs/ngy", "ld/lt", and "nj" consonant cluster signs, and in the “ncs", "nd", "ngy", "nj", and "nt" characters of Nikolsburg alphabet (Fig. 18). Only certain phonetic forms can be compared, as character forms are different in the three alphabets. They do not allow the graphic identification of Turkish and Székely letters, but prove the common origin of their syllabification system.

That means that in Turkish script and in the two Székely "alphabets" syllabification seems to have been determined by the common ancient source and the linguistic relationship of the languages. Although most syllabic signs are letter combinations (ligatures), both the tradition of ligatures and the idea of syllabification are very old[2]; only the forms of certain syllable signs have been altered several times. "nt" and other characters which are more than ten thousand years old prove that Székely syllabifying system could not have developed from a Semitic type of syllable script or a Greek type of alphabet, as the Székely has more ancient characteristics.

Fig. 21 The Ugaritic cuneiform alphabet as it has survived in a clay tablet (Doblhofer/1962/230)

 

Usually these ligatures are regarded as generally used, but individual creations developed for ease of use and to save space and time. Saving time and space was necessary even as early as ten thousand years ago. In fact, syllable signs are important typological features that characterize the age that gave rise to Székely script and related writing systems. The creation of syllable signs from letters corresponds to the tendency of increase in character number in all the other systems that could develop without difficulties. The Chinese character set grew due to similar character montages, but the requirements of Chinese language made Chinese script develop in a different direction.

Consequently, Székely runic script is a perfect letter script that has both word and syllable signs making syllabifying script possible. The Székely character set is similar to those syllabic scripts that had already developed a distinct letter set and a practice of letter writing. It surpasses syllabic scripts in the consistent application of letters, and in this respect it is similar to the Greek writing system, the first so-called real letter script.

---

[1] The term "Western Semitic syllable writing" we use to describe the various scripts used by Phoneticians, Hebrews and other Semitic peoples from the 2nd millennium BC means that these writings are syllabic and not alphabetic. They were mere syllabic writings and nothing more. (Gelb/1976/299)

[2] The two different "s" characters may mark syllable groups. One variant with a small additional stroke (Fig. 13) is next to the sounds "a", "i", "o", "u", the other is beside sound "e" (Csallány/1963/52).

Contents

Preface to the English edition	7.
Preface	9.
History of the scientific views on the origins of Székely runic script	10.
Principles of deriving the origins of Székely script	26.
The development of writing	28.
The shapes of runes and the objects they represent	29.
The mythology, names, and sound values of runes	32.
Rituals and runic script	35.
Types and number of characters	37.
Order of characters	39.
Direction of reading and characters	48.
Syllabic signs	52.
The regular use of syllable and vowel signs	55.
The birth of letter scripts	58.
Comparing of writing systems	61.
The academic historical-geographical preconception	68.
The Turkish connection	70.
What the historical sources say	71.
Székely script of the Huns	73.
The age of the development of Székely character forms	79.
The age of unification of Székely character sets	82.
Hungarian vocabulary connected to writing	87.
Ligatures that survived millennia	92.
Migrations of peoples	97.
Summary	101.
Bibliography	109.

Varga Géza

www.cserepmadar.hu     www.csinyalohaz.hu

Cserépmadár szállás & Csinyálóház imázsvideó